Sunday, November 30, 2008
ACER, one of the world’s leading computer manufacturers expects the distribution of notebooks to increase significantly over the next three years.
The company’s Europe Middle East and Africa vice president Emanuele Accolla, said they have a strategy to exploit such a growth.
“The broad strategy is to cover the entire mobile computing sphere – from notebooks, to mini notebooks (or netbooks) to smart handhelds.
“According to Accolla, notebook unit sales will exceed desktop sales next year, and by 2011/12, 60 per cent of the 600 million units expected to ship globally in that period will be notebooks,” he said.
He said the acquisition of E-Ten this year would play a significant role in enhancing the company’s growth in that aspect.
The reasoning behind the acquisition of E-Ten was that we not only wanted to grow the business by entering a new market segment, but the main reason was the telecommunications technology that is becoming more and more important for computer technology.
Even with computer notebooks finishing third behind peace and happiness on adults' holiday wish list, this year could mark the worse holiday shopping season in 30 years. Analysts say iPhones, BlackBerry Storms, T-Mobile's G1 with Google, notebook computers, flat screen televisions and video game systems may stack up on retailers shelves in unprecedented numbers. The good news? Aggressive price cutting.
Do we really need it? Can we get by with a smaller model? Do we really need this year's latest and greatest update to cell phones and digital cameras? As the economy continues to totter, those are the questions electronic retailers most fear this holiday season.
What retailers do know this year is not to expect long lines for hot electronics or any crazed demand amid teeming crowds at the malls and strip centers. Some analysts are even predicting the slowest holiday shopping season in 30 years.
Monday, March 31, 2008
What's the point?
Why bring out an upgrade if the difference is minimal?
The updated models come with new Intel processors, larger hard disks, more main memory, and more graphics memory.
The new Penryn processor was expected to improve battery life, but I noticed something when I compared the specs for the old MacBook Pro to those of the new model. The new machine's stated battery life has dropped from six hours to just five. However, Apple now refers to five hours of "wireless productivity," whereas the old machine didn't use that qualifier. This suggests to me that Apple is now rating battery life with wireless networking enabled, and may have been doing the measurements with Wi-Fi off on the older machines. If that's what happened, Apple should explain it; without the explanation, the apparent drop in battery life is disappointing.
Well, these machines are just a midlife kicker. The real advance will show up later this year when Apple ships machines based on Intel's forthcoming Montevina platform, which includes the same Penryn processors but introduces a new family of chipsets code-named Cantiga.
Apple will presumably add other new features along with Montevina. I have no idea what Apple is working on, but we can look at other PC notebooks on the market today to see what technology Apple might consider adopting:
- Extreme Edition processors
- Support for more than 4GB of DRAM--Mac OS X "Leopard" is a full 64-bit OS and 4GB isn't really enough any more, especially if you use a virtualization environment such as Parallels Desktop or VMware Fusion to run Windows apps within Mac OS X
- Integrated WWAN--I use an Option ExpressCard 3G adapter for the AT&T network, but I'd rather have this function built in to free up the slot
- Blu-ray optical drives--I expected to see this feature last year!
- A secondary solid-state hard disk--I suggested this feature in a blog post last June, and now Sony has it in its Vaio TZ92 notebook
- Intel HD audio
- Nvidia's GeForce 8800M GTS and GTX graphics chips
- Hybrid graphics--the ability to use a discrete graphics chip for high performance or the simpler graphics engine in the chipset for longer battery life; Sony offers this feature too
- A fingerprint reader--Apple's systems are already more secure than most Windows machines, but a fingerprint reader would be a useful complement to existing security measures
- Tablet mode--maybe not on all machines, but it'd sure be nice to see a tablet-capable MacBook
Apple has often been ahead of the competition. Earlier PowerBook and MacBook models were among the first notebooks to introduce super-thin cases, Gigabit Ethernet, motion sensors, LED backlights, DVI video outputs, FireWire, and other advanced features. Perhaps Apple is looking well beyond the features I've listed here, some of which have become almost routine in Windows notebooks.
Of course, even without these improvements, existing MacBook and MacBook Pro machines are still among the sleekest, fastest, and most capable notebook PCs on the market. But no tech company can afford to stand still, not even Apple.
And I need a reason to replace my own MacBook Pro. It's almost a year and a half old, and I'm getting itchy. C'mon, Apple, surprise me!
Most of them are Linux-based or Macs.
At the price-comparison site PriceGrabber, only five of top 15 most popular laptops are Windows-based. The top seller is a Linux-based Asus Eee PC. In fact, three versions of that Linux notebook are in the top 15 sellers. And in the top 15 sellers there are a total of seven --- yes, that's right seven -- different sizes and configurations of MacBooks. HP, Toshiba, and Sony are the only manufacturers of Windows-based laptops in the top 15.
This isn't only happening on just PriceGrabber. Over on Amazon, things are even worse for Windows laptops. The nine top best-selling laptops are either Asus Eee PC Notebooks running Linux or Macbooks. Of the top 15, only three are Windows-based, made by Toshib and HP.
Now, keep in mind that these numbers are quite skewed. Online retailers don't take into account direct sales like Dell, or corporate sales --- and those numbers are quite large. There's no doubt that when those numbers are taken into account, Windows-based laptops far outsell Linux and Mac machines.
Still, these numbers should scare Microsoft. It shows that Web-savvy consumers are turning away from Windows-based laptops. They tend to be influencers, so where they go, others will most likely follow.
You can make the argument that this trend has nothing to do with Microsoft's actions. Above all, these laptop buyers seem to be making their choices based on price, size, and overall design. Microsoft doesn't make the hardware, so you can argue that Microsoft isn't to blame for design, size, and price.
You certainly can make that argument, but you'd be wrong. Take a look at the buyers that Microsoft is losing. The Asus and MacBooks represent two different types. The Asus laptops appeal to those who want very light laptops, as well as bargain hunters and techies. Linux can run quite well without high-end hardware, so very light, inexpensive laptops can be built around it. In addition, manufacturers don't have to pay Microsoft for Windows, keeping the laptops cheap.
MacBooks represent a different end of the spectrum. They certainly aren't cheap, and generally cost more than their Windows-based counterparts. But they are beautifully designed, and because both OS and hardware come from the same vendor, don't have the same kind of hardware woes that affect Windows-based laptops.
For both types of buyers, Windows is at least part of the reason why buyers are flocking to Asus and the MacBook. Vista is a hardware hog, and so you simply can't design a workable, inexpensive, ultralight laptop that runs it. It requires higher-end processors and graphics cards, and a relatively capacious hard disk. So for those who want laptops that are both light and cheap, the Asus is the only way to go.
Those who are willing to pay, on the other hand, choose MacBooks because they feel Mac OS X is superior to Vista. Once again, then, Windows is to blame.
Microsoft can't compete on the low-and-cheap end because Windows has too many heavy requirements for it to be able to run on cheap, light hardware. It can certainly run on light hardware, but you have to pay through the nose for light. And it can run on cheap hardware as well, but then you'll be lugging around a laptop with too much weight.
The defenses of MacBook Air were hacked within moments in a recent security expo contest, reports say. During the CanSecWest conference's "PWN 2 OWN" competition, participants were expected to hack into one of three notebooks, and read the contents of a file using only an original zero-day attack. An award of $10,000 plus an Air is said to have gone to Charlie Miller, who broke into the computer within two minutes. This was accomplished by redirecting a web browser to a site with exploit code by Miller.
Under the terms of the competition, Miller cannot talk about the details of his exploit until the contest's sponsor notifies Apple, giving it a chance to rectify the problem. It is believed however that since the rules of the competition dictate relying on pre-installed software, the hack was directed through Apple's Safari software.
The speed of the hack is considered especially impressive given that last year, a break-in for the MacBook Pro required nine hours. At the end of Thursday's competition timeframe, two PC notebooks -- a Sony Vaio and Fujitsu U810 -- had yet to be cracked, according to observers.
I don't even have a laptop.
I finally got a cell phone in 1999 but only because of a woman.
There was a chick I was nuts about.
We were both in vice. It seemed so right.
We met at a Conservative synagogue on a Friday night.
We bonded over a movie set in the Catskills in 1969 - Walk on the Moon.
Anyway, that was the night I fell for her.
It was a beautiful movie and she's a beautiful woman.
We walked out in to the parking lot and I confessed my sins.
She accepted me.
It was a beautiful thing.
We missed each other coming and going.
One day she left a message on my home machine asking me to a concert that night.
I didn't have a cell phone and I didn't check my messages. So I missed that opportunity and I never got to go out with her again.
I was so ticked off I went and got a cell phone.
I've hardly used it over the past nine years. I only turn it on once or twice a week (unless there's something special).
The first mass wave of wireless connectivity was the cell phone.
Then it was the computer notebook.
Titus Hoskins writes July 1, 2005:
Wireless notebooks uses three major wireless data standards in order to transfer data. The one that is probably most common is 802.11b, also called Wi-Fi which stands for Wireless Fidelity.
Wi-Fi or 802.11b transfers data wirelessly at a maximum rate of 11Mbps for up to 150 feet. It uses the 2.4GHz radio spectrum and although it says 11Mbps, you will probably only get around 4-6Mbps in actual use. But this is enough bandwidth for high speed Internet, gaming and most file transfers.
The 802.11a is another standard that uses the 5GHz radio spectrum, so it has 8 channels available instead of only 3 that’s available with 802.11b. The ‘a’ version also permits a larger transfer, at a maximum of 54Mbps.
The other standard, 802.11g, is a hybrid of ‘A’ and ‘B’ - its also capable of 54Mbps but it uses the 2.4 GHz spectrum and is compatible with 802.11b devices. Some notebooks like the Fujitsu LifeBook N6010, have a tri-mode 802.11a/b/g wireless system that uses all three forms!
The next technology in Wireless Communication is 3G EV-DO! Sounds like one of those funny robots from Starwars - but it stands for evolution-data optimized. This new technology will change how we view and use the world wide web.
Verizon Wireless 3G EV-DO began commercial operations in Oct. of 2003 and is now expanding to over 125 million US consumers by the end of 2005. With download speeds of 400 to 700 kbps and bursts up to 2 Mbps, 3G has really given us wireless Internet this time. It has or will turn the Internet into a truly wireless system that’s devoid of any cables or lines. It will be everywhere - no space within our biosphere will be without the Internet very soon.
Of course, it should be kept in mind, that any group of computers can be made wireless by using a wireless router and a wireless network adaptor for each computer. Also, many notebooks and computers come with a Bluetooth module, which allows for wireless communication between any sort of electronic devices - from cell phones to computer to stereos to headphones.
However, if you’re setting up a wireless network or if you’re using your wireless notebook or laptop at hotels and airports - security will be a concern. Anyone, within distance possessing the right equipment and a little ingenuity may get access to this wireless system. For major corporations or the lowly homeowner; safeguards need to be taken to prevent unwanted visitors from interrupting your peaceful wireless universe.
There are usually two basic methods of securing wireless networks, WEP and MAC address filtering. The MAC (Media Access Control) is the physical address or unique hardware identifier given to each device in the network. Then you manually enter a list of addresses that can use or access your wireless network.
The other filtering process is more secure, WEP or Wireless Encryption Protocol requires a shared key between the users and then using this key to encrypt and de-encrypt data that’s transmitted between your network users.
Many major hotel chains and other businesses are now offering ‘Wi-Fi’ services as an added convenience to their patrons. These ‘hot spots’ are popping up everywhere, even at some gas stations. You may need to sign in or get a password or key to access these services.
But like your cell phone conversations, any radio transfer or transmission will not be as secure as a wired connection. Keep this in mind if privacy is a major concern for you. But don’t let it stop you from enjoying the convenience, portability and practicality of your wireless notebook or laptop.
Peru is experimenting.
Christopher Dawson writes:
I think the answer to this is “Yes” for a variety of reasons but I’d like to get some feedback from you. Peru is beginning to roll out 400,000 OLPC XO laptops this week to villages throughout the country, according to Technology Review.
As the article points out, though, 90% of the villages to which the XOs are being deployed don’t have Internet access.
Peru’s effort, if successful, would be a model for other nations. In the training now under way, teachers must become versed not only in how to operate and maintain the laptops, but also in how to do their jobs within a newly laptop-centric educational model. The laptops will contain some 115 books, including textbooks, novels, and poetry, as well as art and music programs, cameras, and other goodies.
To my mind, the textbooks alone are worth the cost (assuming, as I have always maintained before, that basic needs are already being met in the villages) if they meet the curricular needs of the teachers and students. However, a key element of a computer’s utility in 2008 is Internet access. How do you feel? To be truly effective and provide the most benefit to students, should communications infrastructure be in place before laptops like the XO and Classmate are rolled out?
Front man Steve Jobs announced the MacBook Air at Macworld Expo in January 2008. He pushed its environmental benefits including being completely mercury and arsenic free, exceeding European Standards.
In May 2007 Apple also promised to completely eliminate the use of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) and Brominated Fire Retardants (BFRs) in the printed wiring on motherboards, and arsenic in the glass of all flat-panel displays by the end of 2008.
Sony was the first to go BFR and PVC-free last November with their Vaio notebook, according to Greenpeace.
While the MacBook Air has less PVC and BFRs than other Mac computers, it is not entirely free of them. Had it been it would have made Apple an ecological leader.
A recent update to Greenpeace’s Guide to Greener Electronics shows that Apple is greener than Microsoft and that Nintendo is the worst eco-offender. The Guide ranks top market leaders of the mobile phone, computer, TV and games console markets according to their policies and practices on toxic chemicals and takeback.
He writes about the latest news from Dell.
The company plans to save $3 billion with a massive number of layoffs (almost 9,000 people).
It's going to start focusing on computer notebooks and the like.
In fiscal 2009, Dell said it will focus on its consumer, enterprise, notebook, small and medium sized business and emerging market businesses. Dell, which largely reiterated prior forecasts, will also close its desktop manufacturing plant in
In a blog post, Lynn Tyson, VP of investor relations at Dell, said:
Over the last three years, driven by the massive shift in customer preference for notebooks - especially among consumers, industry forecasts for the rate of growth of desktops have declined from 10.8 percent to 3.6 percent. And the desktop to notebook mix in the U.S. has declined from a 70/30 split in 2005 in favor of desktops to a 50/50 split today. Our fiscal fourth quarter of last year reflects this change as we grew notebook units year over year by 37 percent and desktops by 10 percent.
Another interesting thread: Dell plans on “undertaking a strategic assessment” of its Dell Financial Services (DFS) unit, which provides credit to consumers and small businesses. The review may also include commercial leasing. Amid the credit crunch, many companies that have dabbled in offering credit to consumers are evaluating whether they want the risk on their books.
Dell disputed that its review has anything to do with the credit crunch. However, it’s a little hard not to connect those two events. Tyson said:
First, our assessment of our DFS business is unrelated to what is going on right now in the credit markets - we completed the acquisition and so the natural next step is to pursue our strategy, simple as that. Many companies - GE and Target - to cite recent examples - often assess the ownership structure of their financing companies. In our case we are primarily evaluating three key things: (1) can DFS provide even better and most robust product offerings to our customers, (2) can we accelerate the investments we are making in DFS and, (3) are there more efficient ways to fund DFS. Our assessment may result in no change, or a sale to or partnership with a fully dedicated financing company.
Second, relative to our consumer financing receivables - less than 20 percent of our net customer receivables - or $1.6 billion - were to subprime customers. This percentage is similar to what it was in our fiscal third quarter. Based on our assessment of these customers financing receivables and the associated risks, we believe we are adequately reserved.
Separately, Dell filed its annual report. Among the notable excerpts:
- We expect that the competitive pricing environment will continue to be challenging. However, we believe that the strength of our evolving business strategy and indirect distribution channels, as well as our strong liquidity position, makes us well positioned to continue profitable growth over the long term in any business climate. For consumers, we recognize the increasing importance of product “ID”, which is the appearance, ease of use, and ability to interact with peripheral products like cameras and MP3 players, and we are focusing more resources to improve in this area.
- As of February 1, 2008, we held a worldwide portfolio of 1,954 patents and had an additional 2,196 patent applications pending.
- We have developed and started implementing a plan to combine the consumer business of both EMEA and APJ with the U.S. Consumer business and re-align our management and financial reporting structure. We will begin reporting worldwide Consumer once we complete the global consolidation of this business, which we expect to be the first quarter of Fiscal 2009. The changes have had no impact on our operating segment structure to date. This segment will include worldwide sales to individual consumers and select retailers.
The idea of increasing the notebook production capacity is due to the acquisition of the notebook unit of Arima Computer.
The Arima plant in Wujiang, China has only shipped 800,000 notebooks in 2007, although the actual capacity lies at around four million per year. This can be further expanded to approximately 10-12 million notebooks, provided that the order inflow will also expand.
CEE shipments were up 26.7% in 2007, representing $8.3B in sales, according to IDC.
Though the market is almost four times less than the $31.3B Western European notebook market, CEE is seeing sustainable faster growth, said Stefania Lorenz, research director at IDC who looks at the region. This year, she expects a 20% increase in shipments for CEE.
Price will remain a key traffic and volume generator, particularly in retail, with large notebook promotion deals sold at spot prices. Last year, the low price point for a notebook PC in CEE, on average, was $1100, Lorenz said. This year, she expects it to be $1000.
Ultra-lowcost notebooks are entering Europe and attracting service providers hunting for new revenue streams. Germany's T-Mobile, for example, partnered with Asustek Computer of Taiwan to bundle broadband connectivity with its Eee PC, which debuted in 2007 for under 500 Euro ($765) and is now in a supply shortage.
This year, Europe will see the entry of the $300 (193 Euro) notebook PC for children. The laptop, developed by Intel initially for poor children, is a special basic machine for a specific segment. Nonetheless, it could increase downward pricing pressure on notebooks overall.
"It will revolutionize the notebook market but it is not a standard notebook as we know it," Lorenz said, adding that IDC is now assessing the potential market impact.
Notebook manufacturers in CEE include Dell Computer, which runs a $311M (200M Euro) factory in Lodz, Poland and Lenovo, which in January announced a $20M (13M Euro) plant in Lower Silesia, southwest Poland.
Democrat MP Apichart Sakdiset voiced suspicion about irregularities relating to a planned purchase of computer notebooks for distribution to 480 lawmakers.
"No one seems to know about the specifications and doubts linger about computer prices," he said in a query raised from the floor.
He said in a past procurement, the price tag went as high as Bt80,000 per notebook that quickly became obsolete despite a premium paid above the market price.
House Deputy Speaker Apiwan Wiriyachai ensured that he would closely monitor the procurement as he was in charge of information technology for the lower chamber.
"I have instructed relevant officials to buy computer notebooks under three guidelines - openended specifications, a just price and good quality," he said.
He said he expected the House to pay about Bt42,000 per notebook. - The Nation
Why? How? Who's number one? Number two?
Thanks to two major acquisitions, Taiwan's Acer surpassed Dell Computer as the number two supplier of notebooks, second to top-ranked Hewlett-Packard Co.
"A few brands managed to surpass the notebook market's amazing unit growth, but most brands had difficulty achieving that level," said John Jacobs, director of notebook research at DisplaySearch.
"While Acer's brand outpaced the market, when their Gateway and Packard Bell acquisitions are factored into the equation, the results are less positive, indicating that their acquisitions were on a downward trend," he added.
Notebook sales grew at a more stately 14 percent quarterly rate in the last three months of 2007 to 33 million units. DisplaySearch projects notebook PC shipments to rise to 135 million units in 2008.
HP remained top in notebook PC sales for the sixth consecutive quarter, maintaining more than a two million-unit lead over Dell, now ranked third. DisplaySearch said HP has about 20 percent of the total market.
One bright spot for Dell is that it managed to maintain its notebook market share lead in North America, holding off HP by just over 3 percent. But overall, Acer has made a fast advance in notebooks.
At the end of 2006, Dell's notebook shipments exceeded Acer by more than a million units. At the end of 2007 the gap dropped to less than 100,000 units, and when Acer's shipments are added to those of its acquisitions--Gateway and Packard Bell--Acer passed Dell by more than 600,000 units in 2007.
The most popular notebook flat-panel size and resolution was 15.4 inches and 1280 - 800 pixels in the third quarter, the most recent period for which DisplaySearch has figures. The screen type accounted for half of all notebooks shipped in that quarter.Screens measuring 14.1 inches with a 1280 - 800 resolution followed a distant second at 23 percent of all units shipped in the quarter.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
On March 19, the WSJ says:
Last week, we wrote about a new study by researchers at the University of Utah that found people who used big computer screens – or multiple ones – completed a series of computer tasks significantly faster than people using smaller screens. (Some people mistook this for a 2003 study by the same researchers; this was an updated one.) The study was sponsored by a company that makes computer monitors, so readers had a right to be skeptical. Instead, reader after reader posted about how much more productive having a bigger monitor made them.
This comment was fairly typical:
- “I actually had trouble convincing users that two monitors would make their lives easier. I found that if I promised to install a second monitor and then to come back that same afternoon and remove it if they didn’t like it I could get them to at least try a two monitor solution. I never once took the second monitor off anyone’s system. Most often, as soon as I stuck my head in the user’s office door they would threaten to kill me if I even touched their new monitor.”
There were a few naysayers. One reader asked if anyone has heard of “Alt-Tab,” the keystrokes that let people who use Microsoft’s Windows operating system toggle between two applications. Others question whether businesses would be willing to spend the money to outfit employees with an extra monitor. “If only we could afford the luxury of large monitors where I work!” one reader wrote. “Unfortunately our Director of IT is just too tight for that!” And some thought that a big monitor was nice, but pretty meaningless if it wasn’t high resolution as well.
But overall, about 80% of the comments were from people bragging about their increased productivity. (So feel free to send the thread to your boss.)
One information-technology pro pointed out the hidden value of bigger screens:
- 1. People can’t see me at my desk
2. I get to be more productive
3. A.D.D. folks understand `out of sight, out of mind’
4. People can’t see me at my desk
5. One screen monitors the network full time
6. Different browsers at the same time
7. People can’t see me at my desk
In our company, we have about 30 employees running OS 9 and using 15″ monitors. I wonder how our productivity would rise if we would actually invest some dollars in equipment, not just grasping at bloated profits?
What percentage of businesses do you think can afford new equipment like 24″ monitors? I know in my industry (newspaper), they are doing everything they can to continue the unrealistic profit margins. Even at the expense of happy employees.
Comment by Bryan - March 10, 2008 at 11:09 am
Well, I’ve just bought two HD NEC monitors for a client’s editing system (I DON’T work for NEC) and before I delivered the system, I used it for less creative work with spreadhseets and email and some page-layout. It was another world. I had 3800 pixels to play with (horizontally). I spent less time have to work out which window to open and organise my mental processes to jump between things because most of what I needed was in front of my eyes at all times.
But I wouldn’t just say size is the thing - quality too. When you’re staring at something all day, the sharper, cleaner and more vibrant it is, the less your head is going to start pounding and the more your eyes will be functioning without strain.
Oh, and you might have a more relaxed evening too.
Comment by Ben Wharton - March 10, 2008 at 12:54 pm
This should really seem to be a no-brainer. We coders have known forever that dual-head is more than a marginal increase in productivity. Imagine … code spec and CM tool on one screen, IDE on the other. It’s a marvelous arrangement. Has been for years.
Comment by Miranda - March 10, 2008 at 1:30 pm
The size of the monitor can of course be a factor, but isn’t the total number of pixels what counts (provided your eyesight can handle the resolution)? What where the pixel settings in this study? One more thing - having worked with both large hi-res and dual head setups for years, I can say that productivity increases over time. To utilize the setup properly you must get used to it. To me, soon 50, bigger screen with same number of pixels is very nice to save straining my eyes or using specs.
Comment by pixel geek - March 11, 2008 at 6:20 am
I suspect this is purely an example of the Hawthorne Effect (if you don’t know what that is, look it up, it’s a wonderful thing).
Comment by pmarlowe - March 11, 2008 at 6:34 am
This photo is the result of 20 hours worth of wiring and configuration. I used Widows Vista 64B, in a fairly typical self-built box (AMD/ Nvidia MOBO). I tried to put an ATI X1300 PCI video card in it but struggled for hours to get ATI and Nvidia to play nice, vista wasn’t helping much either.
It sure is sweet though:
Comment by Chris Leeds - March 11, 2008 at 8:34 am
wow, and i bet Sony will soon be releasing a study that says Bigger Plasma TVs improves the vision of those that watch t.v. Why would anyone care about the research on monitors completed by a firm that sells them? It is a sales gimic, used since there has been a slow down in tech dept. purcahases lately..
Comment by Richard C. Wilson - March 11, 2008 at 9:34 am
Maybe it`s not how big a computerscreen, but how much of the rest of the world you can see…
Comment by Easily Destracted - March 11, 2008 at 10:03 am
Well after all you do have TWO eyes! :=)
Comment by wingnut - March 11, 2008 at 10:25 am
I think it all comes down to screen resolution.
If you have a 24″ with 1440×900 resolution then you are not getting any more desktop space than a 19″ with same res.
I guess this study assumed that people would use their monitors are their max res.
Comment by Vitaly - March 11, 2008 at 11:21 am
Comment by joeblow - March 11, 2008 at 11:51 am
I use an external monitor with my Inspiron 6000 laptop - by “extending” the desktop onto the second monitor, I’m able to use both the laptop’s original monitor and a 20-inch Dell LCD as two distinct parts of a single workspace. Having two monitors, as well as wireless keyboard/mouse combo is convenient.
Comment by Economist - March 11, 2008 at 11:52 am
You mean size does matter? Sorry, I was reading the Spitzer stories before this one.
Comment by Huh - March 11, 2008 at 11:56 am
I keep my desktop resolution at 800×600 — I don’t need to see more things, I need to see them bigger.
Comment by Noumenon - March 11, 2008 at 1:35 pm
24″ monitor resolution is 1920×1200. i like the one i have a lot.
Comment by M - March 11, 2008 at 1:59 pm
for the guy using 800×600:
You can use a higher resoliton and increase the font and icon sizes on windows.
Comment by eric c - March 11, 2008 at 2:47 pm
What’s really annoying is that the IT people all have huge screens or two screens. And they set up all the applications.
In the trenches, we have one little screen and have to always be moving the windows around — because the apps are set up assuming the screen size the IT people use.
They also have printers with “Times New Roman Bold” font installed, so Word’s Font Substitution always shows us that it is replacing that font with itself.
Give IT the _least_ capable machines.
A rising technology tide lifts all the boats ONLY if the IT people are tied up to the dock using the shortest ropes.
Comment by argh - March 11, 2008 at 3:01 pm
SO YOU CAN FINISH WORK 2.5 HRS EARLY - UNLESS YOU HIRE FEW PEOPLE OR ACTUALLY DO MORE, THERE IS NO BENEFIT TO THE BUYER.
Comment by JOE - March 11, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Your employer pays you $?? an hour to work. If it takes you 100 hours to do something and the can cut that down to 75 hours by getting you a 2nd monitor they just saved 25x$?? Assume $?? is $20 ($20 an hour = a $40k a year salary). That means for each 100 hour task the BUYER would save $500.
You can look at it another way, assume it was going to take you 10 days and that giving you a 2nd monitor shortened that to 7 days. Well, now they can have you work on something else for those 3 days. In the end it saves them money.
A 23 inch monitor is a whopping $240 a Costco. Most computers and notebooks will already run a second monitor so it’s unlikely they have to buy any more equipment and on top of that, even if they do a video card is like $60. So, for a total max investment of $300 they can get several hundred dollars of month of more work from their employees. It seems like a no brainer.
As for the research being sponsored by NEC, I can only assure you that most people I know, including myself, are VASTLY more productive on two monitors. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out all the reasons why that would be true.
Comment by greggman - March 11, 2008 at 4:21 pm
Are you referring to a 2003 study with this post? Where is the link to the survey you’re talking about?
Comment by TechMaven - March 11, 2008 at 5:07 pm
What is really funny is that this is the 2003 study, but it keeps on coming up all over the web. Every 4-5 months someone mentions it in either a blog or article.
I have been looking for a copy of the original study for a while, but nobody seems to know where it is
Comment by Denzel - March 11, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Totally. I chimed in on this topic and show how it has improved my life, beyond work. http://juliaroy.com/
Comment by Julia Roy - March 11, 2008 at 6:58 pm
I was the network hardware specialist for a fairly large government agency here in Atlanta.
I actually had trouble convincing users that two monitors would make their lives easier. The most common reason for not upgrading to two monitors was they didn’t want to lose the desk space the second monitor would require.
I told my people that they already had a mental model for using two monitors. I pointed out that they already knew how to read something off one piece of paper and then write on another piece of paper. Two monitors work the same way.
I found that if I promised to install a second monitor and then to come back that same afternoon and remove it if they didn’t like it I could get them to at least try a two monitor solution.
I always kept my promise to show up and check on how the work was going with two monitors instead of one butI never once took the second monitor off anyone’s system. Most often, as soon as I stuck my head in the user’s office door they would threatened to kill me if I even touched their new monitor.
Comment by Otpu - March 11, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Anybody that doesn’t have two monitors by now that sits at a computer all day works for a VERY CHEAP company and should not ever expect a decent raise or bonus if they won’t fork out an extra $300 for a decent monitor setup.
Comment by cybergal - March 11, 2008 at 11:03 pm
Smaller screen size = less productivity?
Comment by John - March 11, 2008 at 11:17 pm
If you’re an engineer at Google, you get a 30″ HP LCD. Or, you can opt for two 24″s. Employees in other departments get one 24″.
Comment by Googler - March 12, 2008 at 3:17 am
Wide vs Normal aspect ratio?
Comment by digchinese.com - March 12, 2008 at 4:44 am
On aspect ratio: “Knowledge workers” are probably better off with widescreen. On a 22″ widescreen at 1680×1050, two full pages of text fit readably side-by-side; for many tasks, additional horizontal space has more marginal benefit than additional vertical space.
Comment by Michael - March 12, 2008 at 8:06 am
Well…as they say…size matters :)
Comment by jackdog - March 12, 2008 at 9:38 am
Nearly everyone has dual monitors where I work, and it’s definitely made a difference, particularly amongst the developers. One monitor for code and debugging, one monitor for firefox or safari.
Comment by Pete Clark - March 12, 2008 at 10:09 am
Size isn’t the best measure, Resolution is. A 26″ screen typically has the same resolution as 24″ so the only benefit of a 26″ would be if you have poor eye sight. I run two 24″ monitors, one in landscape and the other in portrait so I get the best of both worlds. It really does make a big difference.
Comment by Mike - March 12, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Been using dual monitors (20″) for several years. The price for digital has been coming down to where two digitals in today’s money costs less than what we once paid for a Princeton CRT with a better dollar.
Work as a controller and I would buy my own if the company didn’t. Spreadsheet up on one, accounting package on the other - only way to work. Two spreadsheets and drag and drop - I’m surprised that productivity gains are as low as they say.
FWIW, the tech speechifier that spoke at our last conference claimed that gains increased through adding three, but you started to lose time when you started knocking them off your desk (four and more). He was serious about the first comment, maybe about the second…
Comment by Just agreeing - March 12, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Are you kidding…I surf WAY more porn with a bigger monitor
Comment by Dave in wilmington - March 13, 2008 at 10:48 am
These results are bunk.
I wonder if the test subjects know about “alt-tab”?
this is an issue of focus switching, and how easily you can do it.
Comment by jason doyle - March 13, 2008 at 11:34 am
I had my 42″ monitor fall on me at work and now my productivity is at zero. :(
Comment by Peter - March 13, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Personally, I find two 4:3 monitors better than one large widescreen monitor. I almost always maximize my windows which makes 2 screens better.
If you work with one large widescreen monitor, you are constantly resizing things which slows you down.
but yeah, I agree with the study… more real estate is better. Some people are initially turned off by 2 monitors because its a bit confusing at first but I suggest pushing through. You will get a lot more work done and you will get promoted!
Comment by Ben - March 13, 2008 at 12:13 pm
to argh and his complaints about IT getting all the goodies. Of course we do; it’s part of our compensation package for doing grunt work in caves. Oh, and the 3 hour day and 4 day work week ain’t bad either…. Supply and demand; ask Bill Gates.
Comment by just another lazy MBA - March 13, 2008 at 12:40 pm
A colleague of mine got himself a 40 inch monitor recently; since then his productivity has increased significantly. If progress continues we think it will be worth investing in one of the new 60 inch monitors.
Comment by Stibb - March 13, 2008 at 1:01 pm
I wish I had a big monitor :-(
Comment by JD - March 13, 2008 at 1:04 pm
In fact i wish i had a computer.
Comment by JD - March 13, 2008 at 1:05 pm
If only we could afford the luxury of large monitors all round where I work! unfortunately our Director of CIT is just too tight for that!
Comment by Stevo - March 13, 2008 at 1:09 pm
I’m a developer. I use 3 monitors and believe there is value in both the number and size of them. I typically have SQL Manager open on left screen, Visual Studio on center 22″, and the site in a browser on the 19″ on the right. I keep the 19″ set to 1280×1024 to simulate the typical users configuration, and check every new page there. It’s a wonderful thing, and I can’t imagine ever doing it without it! I still get slowed down switching occasionally to see my email, or jump to a forum to look something up…so I’m considering a fourth monitor…Peter, if you don’t need that 42″, and if it’s still working, let me know…
Comment by CEM - March 13, 2008 at 1:11 pm
I work for a company that employs 83,000 worldwide, and their policy since I started here last year is, if you have a laptop, you don’t need a monitor. I’ve had nothing less than a 21″ monitor for the past 7 years! Watching people code and administer web sites and databases on their tiny 1024×780 screens is maddening. I brought in an extra flat panel from home. This is ridiculous.
Comment by Fred - March 13, 2008 at 1:57 pm
At work I have a 19″ 4:3 Dell monitor - it’s a pretty nice, bright clear etc. At home I have a 24″ Dell widescreen - it is truly amazing - I can have two word or deltaview documents side by side, and for some tasks that makes life so much better. I’ve used multi-monitor setups a few times, but really much prefer one big screen.
Comment by Mike - March 13, 2008 at 2:59 pm
I run 4 19″ monitors on 1 system and love it. I have mail in one window, web another center for whatever task I am on at that time and the 4th is kind of a catch all.
at home however I prefer just 1 wide screen. Multi monitors just didnt work well there.
Comment by Gary - March 13, 2008 at 3:44 pm
I think I found the original study… http://www.humis.utah.edu/humis/docs/organization_951_1147817063.pdf
Comment by Jon Eric - March 13, 2008 at 4:39 pm
For the people who don’t believe this, or say the study is biased, please read Edward Tufte’s “The Visual Display of Quantitative Information”
Comment by someuideveloper - March 13, 2008 at 6:04 pm
I switched form a 12″ mac laptop to a 24″mac desktop plus spaces. wow. a world of difference. i can not see my graphic files at the same time, as well as having email plus SOHO plus Daylite open at the same window!
i totally believe the study.
Comment by Jake - March 13, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Bigger screen better.
See longer unix command like I can. See more large log file I can. Scroll too much I dont have to.
Comment by somejavaunixdeveloper - March 13, 2008 at 9:08 pm
I am a retired mainframe programmer. I use three 21 inch CRT monitors and would not consider any less. When I help people with their computers, it is hard to only have a single screen.
I can have my HTML editor on one screen and IE with the site on another. Maybe a help file (or something) onthe 3rd monitor.
Comment by Autocoder - March 13, 2008 at 9:39 pm
visit me at
Comment by Autocoder - March 13, 2008 at 9:40 pm
The benefits to multiple monitors increase exponentially with the number of pc’s one uses.
1. people can’t see me at my desk
2. I get to be more productive
3. A.D.D. folks understand `out of sight, out of mind’
4. people can’t see me at my desk
5. one screen monitors the network full time
6. different browsers at the same time
7. people can’t see me at my desk
P.S. argh: we work because you’re generally incapable of it.
Comment by leftystrat - March 13, 2008 at 10:11 pm
What were the results of the study about 7″ screens?
Comment by serapio - March 14, 2008 at 12:08 am
I have read this news earier and many people are discussing about this on seniorwoo.com, a great site for senior singles. Really hot! I thought you would like to check it out!
Comment by flash - March 14, 2008 at 1:40 am
larger screen = more windows = too much objetives in the same time = less interest in what we do = less productivity.
People who use larger screen have to apply GTD !!!
Comment by jipi - March 14, 2008 at 3:45 am
Richard, since you’ve never done any coding on a dual screen setup… you opinion doesn’t match others’s experiences.
Moving your eyes is faster then hitting ALT-TAB and waiting for the OS to redraw the scren. You can have your code on the monitor and the app running on the other. And when the app isn’t running, email, or help/man pages.
Comment by Michaelangelo - March 14, 2008 at 12:12 pm
For any sort of computer work a larger screen makes a huge difference.
In my last job search (10 years ago, IT field), screen size was one of several “environmental” factors I used to evaluate a potential employer. If an employer supplied decent monitors and private office space instead of cubes, I considered that as an indication that they treated their employees well. Who wants to work for a company that doesn’t want to supply you the tools to succeed? And, in fact, considering these factors did help me make a good choice, since I’m still here.
Comment by ViennaDad - March 14, 2008 at 12:35 pm
I upgraded to a 30″ in the office about a year ago. My productivity is through the roof. For one, I enjoy sitting at my desk more and am working longer hours. But I’m also able to complete things faster… alt tab is well and good when you need to flip between programs, but what if you need to see several open documents at once?
Larger screen does not equal less interest in what we do. That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. I love what I do. If a bigger monitor makes YOU less interested in what you do, perhaps your job sucks.
Comment by CreativeType - March 14, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Clearly this depends on your tasks. I do both marketing communications writing and market research reports; when I work from home, I have both a 20″ iMac and a 13″ Vaio to choose from. Doing the market research reports on the Vaio is torture, since it involves lots of cutting and pasting from Excel, writing analysis based on data from the charts and other documents like PDFd annual reports, and writing report and chapter summaries where it’s helpful to be able to scroll through the main body of the report while typing.
But when I’m drafting a brochure, I’m pretty much staring at a blank screen, and maybe a few print-outs of product information for reference. At that point, the bigger screen almost becomes a hindrance because it tempts me to cruise over to eBay or sites like these rather than get my work done!
Comment by e c - March 14, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Just a blog-back, about tuning bandwidth on the wetware bus.
Comment by Bandwidth Tuning - March 15, 2008 at 2:19 pm
If this is true, then one monitor that was the size of the planet would mean that one person could do everything and be the most productive person on Earth.
Comment by Smart - March 15, 2008 at 3:05 pm
I have moved from 1024×768 pixels to 1680×1050…. way better cos i can have two word docs open at once without changing….
but unless u do that all day, there isn’t much productivity boost
Comment by Anonymous - March 18, 2008 at 12:27 am
I use 4 dell monitors in a 2×2 setup at home, and its great. At work I have 4 that are all side-by-side and it isn’t as good as 2×2, but I can tell that I’m getting more done now than I was with the original setup of two monitors.
Comment by Brian - March 19, 2008 at 12:28 am
The reason why you see a limit at 24 to 26″ monitors is because the standard native resolution is 1920×1200.
With that said, I just moved from 1024×768 to 1920×1200 - 17″ to 24″ and it is amazing how much I can see on a spreadsheet now.
Comment by Jhonka - March 19, 2008 at 2:32 am
If any significant portion of the work involves paying a human to copy information between spreadsheets, the better solution would be to invest in some automation and systems design so that humans don’t have to do such mundane work as a routine.
I work at a technology company and if the software we sell required a customer to manually move information around we would get raked over the coals. But all our internal systems at their heart, involve someone cutting, pasting clicking numbers through 20 different spreadsheets.
Comment by Stuart - March 20, 2008 at 2:05 am
I always connect my laptop to a 20″ screen (1680×1050), which greatly improves my productivity, but I think I could do even better with 1920×1200. A 30″ screen is probably overkill for me at this point, though.
Comment by Henning - March 22, 2008 at 4:36 pm
The study concluded that someone using a larger monitor could save 2.5 hours a day. But James Anderson, the professor in charge of the study, tells the Business Technology Blog to take that result with a grain of salt: It assumes that someone will work non-stop for eight hours, which no one will, and that the tasks they perform will all benefit from a larger screen, which isn’t always the case. But things like moving data between files are ideally suited to bigger or multiple screens. Anderson, who uses a computer with two 20-inch screens and one 24-inch one, recommends that businesses take the time to match employees with the proper size screen based on job requirements.
A caveat: The study was funded by NEC, which makes computer monitors. But Anderson says that it was vetted by the University’s research board. Also, he doesn’t care who businesses buy their monitors from – he just wants businesses to realize that the right monitor can make someone more productive. And if a tech department has to buy 500 of the same size in order to get a bulk discount? Buy the biggest ones you can, Anderson tells us. “Size matters,” he adds.
Computer hardware is the physical part of a computer, including the digital circuitry, as distinguished from the computer software that executes within the hardware. The hardware of a computer is infrequently changed, in comparison with software and hardware data, which are "soft" in the sense that they are readily created, modified or erased on the computer. Firmware is a special type of software that rarely, if ever, needs to be changed and so is stored on hardware devices such as read-only memory (ROM) where it is not readily changed (and is, therefore, "firm" rather than just "soft").
Most computer hardware is not seen by normal users. It is in embedded systems in automobiles, microwave ovens, electrocardiograph machines, compact disc players, and other devices. Personal computers, the computer hardware familiar to most people, form only a small minority of computers (about 0.2% of all new computers produced in 2003). See Market statistics.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Contrary to popular belief, you don't have to spend an arm and a leg on a laptop. Thanks to cheaper chips, more efficient software, and the fact that an increased amount of our computing is done online (meaning your computer doesn't need to be as powerful), plenty of notebooks can be had for less than $500. We scoured the tech landscape and found five laptops that will do all your basic computing needs, and then some, but still keep your budget balanced. Unfortunately, we couldn't find any Mac-based laptops – even in the used/refurbished bins – but you'll have to take that up with Steve Jobs. In the meantime, check out our picks for best bargain-basement laptops.
The Windows One: Acer Aspire 5315
Acer's full-fledged Vista-enabled mainstream laptop may not be the fastest, sturdiest, or prettiest, but it'll certainly do when you absolutely, positively have to have Windows for less than $500.
Who it's for: Students on a budget who still need Windows-compatible software (such as PowerPoint and Word for class preparation); parents and grandparents who don't want to do much more than word-process, balance the checkbook, or surf the Web.
What we like: The huge 15.4-inch LCD screen is great for movie-watching and slideshows, and the built-in stereo speakers are surprisingly powerful (considering they're made of plastic!). Sure, it's 6.2-pounds -- more than twice as heavy as the MacBook Air -- but that's not as heavy as we expected at this price point. It has three USB ports, which is generous. The keyboard is spacious and comfortable to type on, and includes a one-touch key for wireless and battery management, and a Wi-Fi on/off button. Most other laptops in this price category don't have a DVD/CD-RW drive, so music rippers and DVD watchers will be pleased that the Acer Aspire does have one.
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Computer Hardware Upgrades
Pay Per Click
Virtual Call Center
Monday, January 14, 2008
For Lenovo Group Ltd., red is the new black.
After years of targeting business users with its conservative, black ThinkPad laptops, the personal-computer company is going after everyday consumers with a flashy new notebook line called IdeaPad.
The product line, which includes red aluminum-alloy cases, beefed-up gaming features and halo lighting, is part of a major strategic shift for Lenovo, as it tries to compete head-on with the likes of Hewlett-Packard Co. and Apple Inc. in selling PCs directly to consumers in the U.S and other developed countries.
But as Lenovo takes aim at consumers, it is looking at a crowded, competitive market. Companies such as Dell Inc. and Acer Inc. are vying for space on retail shelves, and brands are struggling to distinguish themselves on something other than price as differences among computer brands on performance and function have diminished in recent years.
"Everybody's got a glossy black notebook that's super thin and super light, and the question is, what do they do next?" says John Spooner, a senior analyst at Technology Business Research in Hampton, N.H.
January 09, 2008 (IDG News Service) -- The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project and Microsoft Corp. are working together to develop a dual-boot system to put both Linux and Windows on laptops aimed at kids in developing countries, the head of OLPC said in an interview Tuesday.
"We are working with them very closely to make a dual-boot system so that, like on an Apple, you can boot either one up. The version that's up and running of Windows on the XO is very fast, it's very, very successful. We're working very hard to do both," said Nicholas Negroponte, chairman of OLPC.
Asus, the world's largest maker of motherboards, believes it's on the cusp of doing what no Taiwanese tech company has done before: fuel a consumer trend with its new low-cost mini-laptop, the Eee PC.
The former contract technology company is hoping its 7-inch notebook, which sells for less than $500 and slips into a purse, wins it a foothold in the United States. Though Asus is not the only PC maker to jump into this emerging market - and others are expected to follow - it has so far received a thumbs up from analysts and consumers.
The Eee PC is part of a mini movement to market little laptops. Initially, the gadgets were aimed at the developing world. Now, some computer makers realize these light-weight laptops could be sellers in countries like the United States. They have hit a sweet spot among some consumers because of their compact design, low cost and durability.
The two-pound Eee PC, made with children and older people unfamiliar with computers in mind, has garnered unexpected interest from on-the-move adults looking for a slim, durable and light machine for basic computing.
"That's one thing we did not anticipate," admitted Asus President Jonathan Tsang. "It's been pretty hot."
Asus, which launched its customized Linux laptops in October, sold about 350,000 in three months. Early in the holiday season, this iPod of the PCs was the No. 1-selling computer on Amazon.com.
The consensus appears to be that WiMax will be introduced in Apple notebooks, and the much-rumored ultra-portable product. WiMax, you’ll recall, is that next-generation wireless data connection technology that Intel so loves, and that Sprint has been testing under the name Xohm. It’s an interesting notion, and certainly plausible. But Wimax has had some setbacks of late, not the least of which was the parting of the ways between Sprint and Clearwire last year. As Valleywag notes, heading down the Wimax path would be a risky play for Apple. It could certainly be the type of move that sets the entire computer industry on a new course that the PC vendors are forced to follow. Or the service could suck, and the whole idea could conceivably backfire. Dan Frommer at AlleyInsider doubts the WiMax idea, and not unfairly.
There’s also a lot of chatter around streaming video for the iPhone, probably enabled via a Slingbox client for the iPhone. That would be something “in the air” too. Right? Sure. But given that SlingBox software is available for all the other major wireless platforms, from the Blackberry to the Symbian OS, this one is almost obvious.
But there’s another option. One of the rumor sites, Macmegasite suggested that the new wireless technology could be something called “Beam,” which it describes as file sharing technology that’s faster than Bluetooth. That got me to thinking, and suddenly while at the barber shop, a thought struck me: Could Apple be ready to deploy Ultra-Wideband technology? More after the jump.
Bigger isn't always better when it comes to computers and, thanks to tiny notebook PCs, lugging around a computer need not be back-breaking work.
If you've resorted to hiring a sherpa to carry all your high-tech gadgets, a computer that fits in the palm of your hand might seem like the ultimate gadget on the go. Remember the trade-off with a tiny computer is a tiny keyboard and tiny screen. Unless you've got eagle eyes and toothpicks for fingers, you might struggle to achieve any more than slow two-finger (or two-thumb) typing. If you can really get by with a device that small, perhaps you should go the extra step and get a smartphone with a full Qwerty keyboard - such as a Palm Treo 750 or a HTC TyTN II.
Notebook sizes are measured according to the diagonal measurement of the screen. Your standard notebook size is 14 to 15.4 inches (that's roughly 35 to 39 cm, but notebook makers still work with old-school measurements). You generally pay a premium for anything bigger or smaller.
Many notebooks now have widescreen displays, which means the screen is shaped like a rectangular movie screen rather than a squarish television. The fact screens are measured on the diagonal means a 14-inch widescreen display is wider than a standard 14-inch display, but not as tall.
Opting for a small notebook often means sacrificing more than screen real estate and keyboard size. Heat is the natural enemy of the computer, so tiny notebooks usually sport low-power processors to avoid overheating. This shouldn't be a problem for email and web surfing, but if you're after serious grunt for gaming or video editing then a tiny notebook probably won't do.
Lenovo's been known for its business notebooks, the Thinkpads. But now the company is doing the consumer think with a new line called IdeaPads.
The 11-inch U110 was available for viewing for the first time and it's sweet little addition to the growing compact notebook space.
Some things that are cool about it:
-It has facial recognition so it can be unlocked by showing your face. It doesn't matter if you've grown a beard since the last time you've used the computer, it knows who you are. And, if someone tries to log into your computer, it can take a picture of them.
-It's got a touch panel above the keypad that allows you to access media keys.
-It's only 2.3 pounds.
-It doesn't have a bezel around the display.
-It's got some cool etching designs on the front that continue to the back. It's definitely eye-catching.
The pricing hasn't been set for the U110, but it's set to come in less than $2,000 when it goes on sale in April.
Lenovo, which was formed by the acquisition of the former IBM Personal Computing Division, has announced its entrance into the consumer PC market globally through a new line of consumer-oriented computers. The IdeaPad is the name for the company’s new notebook PC line, while the desktop PCs will carry the moniker IdeaCentre.
Three notebooks will be available in Canada later this year: the IdeaPad Y510, Y710 and U110. All three will come powered by an Intel Centrino processor, and include advanced features like facial recognition through VeriFace that makes the user’s face his “password”, Dolby Home Theatre surround sound, and dedicated gaming controls. Each model boasts a frameless screen, and touch-sensitive control surfaces.
"Our ThinkPad notebooks are well-known around the world as the best engineered computer for business: for quality, reliability and thoughtful design," said Liu Jun, Senior Vice President and President, Consumer Business Group, Lenovo. "We're now bringing Lenovo's expertise in design and engineering to consumers with our Idea-branded PCs."
SAN FRANCISCO — After decades as the computer of choice for homes and businesses, the desktop PC is being pushed to the scrap heap by its smaller, nimbler sibling: the laptop.
They've been around since the early 1980s, but portable computers are finally taking over. Last year, for the first time, American consumers bought more of them than desktops. Sixteen of the 20 bestselling PCs on Amazon.com this holiday season were laptops.
U.S. corporations are expected to make laptops the majority of their computer purchases in 2008. BNSF Railway Co. already has. Of the 4,000 Dell Inc. computers it bought last year, 60 percent were laptops, so rail inspectors could file reports from their trucks and other employees could work from home.
"They were in a totally tethered world, and now they have no tethering at all," said Jeff Campbell, the Fort Worth, Texas, company's chief information officer.
Faster, cheaper technology is behind the most sweeping change the computer industry has seen in a generation. Buying a computer that can be spirited away in a briefcase or backpack no longer requires a big sacrifice in performance, storage or money.
Video of the notebook PC exploding in flames shocked viewers and drove down the share prices of its manufacturer, LG Electronics, and battery maker, LG Chem.
According to the most recently published LG Chem safety specifications seen by Texyt.com, the company no longer carries out three safety tests that were designed to ensure batteries could survive physical damage without exploding. The company also reduced the severity of a test that is intended to check battery safety when overheated.
As the annual Consumer Electronics Show winds down to lacklustre reviews, Apple is expected to grab the spotlight with an ultra-slim laptop computer and online movie rentals next week at its biggest annual show - Macworld.
The new products are seen more as enhancements to Apple's current offerings, rather than ones that pack the "wow factor" of last year's star attraction, the iPhone.
...Notebooks have been one of Apple's strongest segments. In its fourth fiscal quarter ended last September, the company sold 1.34 million MacBook and MacBook Pro laptops, up 37 per cent from a year earlier.
Golvin said: "What I'm guessing we might see from Apple is something a little more recognisable as a MacBook device, as a derivative of a laptop or tablet rather than a cool new form factor that sits between laptop and mobile phone."
Last week, it was the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. This week, the big personal tech news event is the annual Macworld Show in San Francisco, where Apple is expected to unveil a new ultra-slim notebook and announce a new movie rental download service.
More than 50,000 people are expected to attend this year's event and Apple CEO Steve Jobs has a real challenge on his hands to match the news from last year's event, where he announced the revolutionary iPhone.
This year, the Apple rumor sites have been in full press mode talking about a new subcompact machine that is 50% thinner than current models. Internet rumor has it called the "MacBook Air," though Apple hasn't officially confirmed anything.
The other big Apple news expected is a deal with most of the major Hollywood studios to allow movie rentals from the iTunes Store. Apple has sold movies via the store for a long time and other firms already allow movies to be rented and downloaded to a PC so, in itself, this is no big deal. What gives it significance is the sheer size of the iTunes store and its more than 70 million users, almost all potential movie renters.
Similarly, no major announcements are anticipated for the iPhone at the show this year, although Jobs is expected to show off a software upgrade that will add some new features like multiparty texting and announce hardware improvements for later this year.
One rumor that's been impossible to shake is that the MacBook Pro could get an upgrade—or rather, downgrade. Don't be surprised to see a thinner, lighter laptop with a 12-inch screen released some time around February (in the $1700-$1800 range). The new machines—some are calling them—"subnotebooks"-will come with Intel inside, naturally.
Second Generation iPhone
This is, after all, the one-year anniversary of the first iPhone announcement. Some expect to see a 16 Gb iPhone, carrying twice the capacity of the current model. Another possibility is that Apple might uncuff the device from AT&T's service—which has been a sore point among folks who prefer to choose their own service provider. (Some more enterprising customers have already taken this matter into their own hands.)
Analysts suspect Jobs will announce that Apple is embracing Blu-ray, Sony's high-definition DVD technology. For its part, Microsoft already has a partnership with Toshiba and its HD DVD format (which, given Warner Bros.'s recent announcement that it will be releasing movies only in the Blue-ray format, may be the losing bet). What better way to stick it to your nemesis?
Technology world braces for latest Apple releases a year after Steve Jobs announced release of the iPhone
A year after Steve Jobs announced the iPhone to the world, thousands of Apple enthusiasts have gathered at the Macworld Conference & Expo 2008 to find out what he has in store this year.
Tomorrow Mr Jobs will take to the stage for the 24th Macworld, with the technology world braced for a series of new announcements. But few of the 50,000 expected to flock to San Francisco imagine that this year’s Macworld will spark the same kind of frenzy as last year.
“All I can say for certain is that Macworld 2008 is not going to top 2007. That was the Macworld of Macworlds,” said Charlie Wolf, analyst at Needham & Co.
The touch-screen iPhone quickly became the must-have gadget of 2007, sparking a doubling of Apple’s share price and spawning a halo effect that sent its share of the personal computer market soaring.
Apple refuses to reveal in advance what it will announce this year, but the firm is expected to unveil a number of new products. Bloggers who have already arrived in San Francisco are particularly excited by posters and banners springing up around the city proclaiming that there is "something in the air".
This, many speculate, could be a reference to a new, ultra-portable notebook that Apple is thought to have been developing. Websites have been buzzing with the suggestion that the ultra-light laptop will be called the Macbook Air. Industry insiders urge caution, however; Apple is well known for spreading false rumours, in a bid to ratchet up the hype.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Apple has received lots of attention in the past year for the launch of the iPhone, but not to be left out, the company's Macintosh computers have been making their own mark.
Apple's share of the worldwide personal-computer market topped 3 percent as of the third quarter, up from about 2 percent two years ago, according to the IDC research firm. It's still a modest slice, but the increase came as Microsoft released a new version of Windows, an event that has boosted interest in Windows PCs in the past.
The increase in Mac sales will be part of the backdrop as Apple CEO Steve Jobs takes the stage Tuesday morning for his annual keynote address at the Macworld Expo in San Francisco. The event is a Woodstock of sorts for the Apple community, and it is closely watched by the rest of the technology industry.
But the Mac's rise is far from the only storyline. These are some of the products, issues and technologies that could play a role in Jobs' keynote and the rest of the conference.
Redialing the iPhone: Jobs used last year's Macworld to unveil the iPhone, Apple's combination iPod, mobile phone and Internet device. Given the timing, six months after its U.S. launch and two months after its European debut, some industry analysts say it would be too soon for Jobs to unveil a second generation of iPhone hardware.
'Ultraportable' Mac? Perhaps the hottest rumor leading up to Macworld is that Jobs may unveil a miniature laptop computer, smaller than existing Macs, perhaps with solid-state flash storage rather than a traditional hard drive.
Now that the Consumer Electronics Show has packed up and left Las Vegas, attention is shifting to this week's Macworld Expo in San Francisco and Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs' keynote speech on Tuesday morning.
The notoriously secretive Cupertino technology company has kept a tight lid on rumors, but that hasn't stopped the rampant speculation about its anticipated new products and services.
This time last year, Apple introduced the iPhone, a move that reinforced Apple's role as a digital lifestyle trendsetter and still reverberates in the consumer electronics industry. The company's stock climbed furiously through 2007, tipping over $200 per share in late December - though, like the rest of the technology industry, it has dropped in early January.
Now the question for Jobs is: What's Apple going to do for an encore?
"What everyone wants from Steve is, 'What's next?' " said Creative Strategies' principal analyst Tim Bajarin. "You don't have to create a new blockbuster every year. What you have to do is make it better. ... They're looking for Apple to keep the record going."
With all the rumors surrounding Macworld, it's difficult to sift through those possibilities that could actually come true and those that are pure rubbish. And while I don't think I have all the answers, it seems more and more likely that some of the expectations some of us have for Steve next week may not come true.
As it stands, most people are saying that iTunes movie rentals will become a reality next week and an ultraportable Mac is in the works. Still others believe Jobs will revamp the Apple TV and some people believe he'll refresh the entire MacBook line. As for me? I'll tell you what he should (and shouldn't) do when he takes the stage next week.
Possibility 1: iTunes Movie Rentals
Gee, you think? Of course Steve is going to announce iTunes movie rentals next week. Whether you want to believe it or not, iTunes is in the midst of a major battle with Amazon on the music front and it's losing right now. Sure, Amazon may not generate as much revenue, but which service has all the DRM-free tunes that you can put on any device you want? It certainly isn't Apple's.
Because of that, Jobs can differentiate iTunes with video and movie rentals. Not only will rentals generate even more revenue for the company's service, it could become a hub for those who are unwilling to leave their homes to rent a movie. That said, this won't take off unless the company has a solid infrastructure in place and we won't need to sit there for hours waiting for the feature-length film to download.
Jobs' game plan for Apple has been apparent since he took back the reins of the embattled Cupertino (Calif.) company in 1997. Products, from the original iMac, which was launched in 1998, to the iPod, have focused on relentlessly reducing complexity, honing the brand's image for clean, simple design.
What's more, additional products—from a new Apple operating system to media devices and computers—all fell into a well-designed ecosystem for a seamless user experience. Jobs also encouraged socializing so users could easily share music, movies, or videos. Executives asking themselves how their company might create a product as successful as the iPod are barking up the wrong tree. A better question, according to designers and innovation consultants, is: "What would Apple do?"
The key, explains Yves Béhar, founder of fuseproject and a winner of a Gold IDEA/BusinessWeek design award, is that "Apple conceives its products as a symbiosis of hardware, software, and user experience." Under Jobs' leadership, he says, Apple has cultivated a corporate culture that inculcates this holistic type of thinking throughout the organization. One result: the so-called iPod ecosystem that includes not only the sophisticated hardware and technology inside the industrial design, but also the iTunes software and user interface, the online music store, and more generally the Mac operating system. "The joke around our offices is that everyone at Apple is a designer because they all think in this way," adds Béhar.
Jesse James Garrett, president of Adaptive Path, a San Francisco firm specializing in user experience design, says: "Apple really excels at taking aspects of our daily lives that we find frustrating and overly complicated and proving they don't have to be as complex as we've always assumed." The company's track record of doing this successfully contributes to the "enormous amount of goodwill for the brand," he adds before suggesting someone should apply the Cupertino-based company's logic to mass public transportation.
During a record-setting 2007, Apple (AAPL) rewrote its history with the success of the iPhone and continuing strong sales of the iPod line. This week, the company is expected to turn the focus to its roots: computers.
On Tuesday at the Macworld conference in San Francisco, Apple will show its new wares, with expectations running high among bloggers, fan sites and Apple analysts that the company will unveil a subcompact notebook computer.
"What will make this unique is its thinness, a good 50% thinner than existing Mac laptops," says Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray. "Notebooks are the fastest-growing segment of the computer market. More people are bringing their computers everywhere with them."
He expects the notebook to skip the traditional hard drive and have built-in flash memory instead, which will help to make it ultra small.
TAIPEI, Jan 14, 2008 (XFN-ASIA via COMTEX) -- QUCPF | news | PowerRating | PR Charts -- Quanta Computer Inc (2382.TW) president CC Leung has raised the company's 2008 shipment target to over 40 mln notebook personal computers from 36 mln originally due to strong projections for the industry's growth, the Economic Daily News reported.
The world's leading notebook contract manufacturer delivered 31.8 mln units in 2007.
The newspaper also quoted Hewlett Packard supply chain official Ike Harris as saying that HP company will order 10 mln notebooks from Quanta Computer this year.
The writing has been on the wall for years concerning the rise of the notebook computer. Notebooks were once relegated to business professionals and the upwardly mobile types that didn't mind paying $1,000 USD or more to “cut the cord.”
However, Intel's Centrino campaign coupled with lower component prices have allowed the notebook market to blossom. Society's craving for wireless Internet access anywhere and a shrinking performance gap between desktops and notebooks have finally allowed the former to rise to the top in consumer PC sales.
Notebooks for the first time outsold desktops during 2007 for the consumer market. Online retailer Amazon.com reinforced the dominance of the notebook with its sales stats for the holiday season – 16 of its top-selling PCs during the holiday season were notebooks.
While consumers are quickly adopting notebooks to replace desktops, corporations are also making the switch – albeit at a slower pace. For this reason, notebooks still trail desktops slightly in overall PC marketshare.
Notebook sales increased to 31.6 million units during 2007 (a rise of 21 percent) while desktop sales dipped to 35 million units (a fall of 4 percent) for the overall PC market. Notebooks are expected to gain momentum in the coming years and are projected to reach 66 percent overall PC marketshare (71 percent for consumers) by 2011.